A Short Response to the Arminian Doctrine of Prevenient Grace – J.W. Hendryx
The term “prevenient grace” – a distinctly Arminian doctrine – refers to a universal grace which precedes and enables the first stirrings of a good will or inclination toward God and it explains the extent or degree to which the Holy Spirit influences a person prior to their coming to faith in Christ. The Arminian, together with the Calvinist, affirms total human moral inability and utter helplessness of the natural man in spiritual matters and the absolute necessity for supernatural prevenient grace if there is to be any right response to the gospel. Like Calvinists, Arminians agree that, apart from an act of grace on God’s part, no one would willingly come to Christ. This point is important to distinguish so as to not confuse Classical Arminianism with either Finneyism or Semi-Pelagianism, which both reject the need for prevenient grace. So Christ’s redemption is universal in a provisional sense but conditional as to its application to any individual, i.e. those who do not resist the grace offered to them through the cross and the gospel. Prevenient grace, according to Arminians, convicts, calls (outwardly), enlightens and enables before conversion and makes conversion and faith possible. While Calvinists believe the inward call to the elect is irrevocable and effectually brings sinners to faith in Christ, the Arminian, on the other hand understand God’s grace as ultimately resistible. In short, they affirm that prevenient grace, which is given to all men at some point in their life, temporarily brings the sinner out of his/her condition of total depravity and puts them in a neutral state of free will wherein the natural man can either accept or reject Christ.
July 29, 2007 at 5:07 pm
i cant find any reference to man’s will in the bible…except to say that man opposes God…the whole thing of free will or even choice isnt even scriptorial…adam didnt have a choice to follow God; adam disobeyed…it wasnt like God gave him a choice; in fact sin is charged because of the law, which in this case woulda been God sayin dont eat…also…the fact of noah bein saved while everyone els e perished, and the children of israel chosen by God to know God at the same time all the other nations didnt know Him and perished in their sin…this certainly affirms that election has always been God’s way…and the verses which seem like theres a choice offered, isnt choice at all, just a statemtn of truth: if you remain in me i will remain in you…Jesus isnt giving anyone an way outta the kingdom; its a statement of separation of wheat and chaff…those who remain and those who never were (since they dont remain, they were never part in the first place)…
many vain philosophies are handed down (like free will) and accepted as truth and we end up twistin Scripture around the philosophy, but thats not the same as preachin truth…anyway…jus some thoughts…be bless… -g-
July 29, 2007 at 6:35 pm
Thank you for your comments CovenantBride. I have to agree with you. I believe that there is freedom of will to sin. We freely sin and are incapable of freely acting righteously for we have not the ability to do so. I think as I read from Scripture that we, especially as fallen individuals, are inclined to sin. If lost man is given the choice between righteous deeds and unrighteous deeds, we will automatically go to the unrighteous deeds. I think Adam had something we did not have prior to the Fall. He had a covenant of works with the Father, where I think he could have freely done the righteous deed of defending his wife and himself at least and more so God against Satan’s forked tongue. He chose the latter freely. On this side of Eden, things are different. Our wills, thoughts, emotions and ability to do anything good are gone. These can only do righteousness through the empowerment of the Holy Spirit.
I appreciate your comments. God bless you.
RAP